No, with * Inside. It Was Kind Of Challenge ,Who Dare To Say That "
Then that’s is weird.
I still suggest using more “*” so it is not easily identifiable as a bad word.
It’s funnier to use replacement words anyways.
Like “what the frack” - everyone gets the point, but nothing is wrong with that statement.
The whole thing is a game. Stay in the rules and play the game correctly and you will not get a ban.
It’s BS to have to jump through hopes, but whatever.
I think I know who one of those console flag trolls you are referring to is, could be wrong with my assumption though
It was definitely not me reporting anyone. I have NOT been on.
to add to banings I was banned 14 days for making an economic comment that was in NO way political. when GM’s do what I call “key word ban sweeps”. where they use 1 word regardless of context of the comment and they ban EVERYONE who uses the key word REGARDLESS of how its used. like “american” or “capitalism” (economic system that’s everywhere where trade exists for services rendered and paid for those services in some way or form. )
No, not you. How did get here so fast anyway? Sorry for the confusion.
Sorry to hear about the 14-day ban. And thanks for explaining the keyword ban sweep mechanism, that’s interesting, and scary. In the sense of scary when used by moderators not trying to behave professionally.
Now, this is a useful contribution to the original topic. The community working together to shed more light on Gaijin’s shady practises.
You do understand that the in game chat is for “game related” chat only right?
You can get a ban for saying anything that does not have to do with the game.
If you want to have a conversation with people about non-game related topics I would suggest using some chat software or a social platform.
while we are at topic @60915652
How it is, when you are on EU servers only, and in battle chat on EU servers russian people spam with their language, is this fine?
because i feel like many people who probably abuse rules, dont get bans.
That happens all the time on the north American servers too!
That seems tedious. I mean, since with the ignore feature one could simply hide all of your comments in one or two clicks, if they thought they were annoying, rather than following you around sabotaging your peace like a psychotic ex-wife.
Furthermore, what gives them the right to decide what I want to see? How is it OK to censor my content because it offends them? That’s like somebody hiding all the onions from me, simply because they don’t like them. How do they get to decide what I read and don’t read? If they don’t like it, just ignore them, right?
Several of us knew this flagging feature was stupid on day one of this forum. The abuse of the feature was childishly predictable.
well, in some games you have “banhammer” ;p
Really? Are you sure? Because I keep trying to tell you that, and you say, “Oh no, it’s war.”
Is it OK to derail this thread and go off topic? I know that gets under your skin, but maybe you’d like to make an exception today.
When Charlie comes around this thread should get locked.
maybe not…‘you know why?’
because ‘everyone loves a clown’
What this dude said…
Oh, and I think this thread is perfectly on topic… taserface & all.
Plus, too, and also, if you’re reading this & you’re the one flagging people, just know I think you’re kinda’ pathetic.
If you’re going to flag a post, please please please make it something really juicy you’re flagging. I get a little frustrated seeing a flagged post, thinking I’m going to get to see something off the wall nuts, but it’s just some dude with a normal rational opinion.
That’s false advertisement, my man. Totally bogus.
Flagging should be used EXCLUSIVELY to communicate to the rest of the forum that what you’re flagging is the most entertaining crap you’ve seen all day.
that’s serious accusation, i hope you got screens of that
Hello all,
@65239400 , as I told you on the first topic GM privilege in battles, - #8, If you think a sanction is unjustified, you can appeal with that link Game rule violations & Appeals against a penalty - Rules - Crossout
Discussing it on a public topic isn’t the way to solve it.
Also, since you deliberately opened a second topic on the same subject after you have been explicitly told to not do it, you’ll have a sanction corresponding your action.
Rule violated : 3.2.21. Public discussion of the actions of the Administration. (for your information)
The reason of such rule is obvious : such discussion about staff actions can be simply presented without full context to other players, and spread false rumors about staff actions and do nothing constructive about the player’s issue but only damage the reputation of the GMs.
GMs like myself and anyone are humain and can make mistakes. If that’s what any player think about their sanctions, they can appeal via the link above.
Regards