GM Privilege in Battles - (2) !?

[DocSavage]

[RoughMonkey]

@MudnBeer

because ‘everyone loves a….

When Charlie comes around this thread should get locked.

[MudnBeer]

@RoughMonkey

When Charlie comes around this thread should get locked.

maybe not…‘you know why?’

because ‘everyone loves a clown’

[Roopull]

@DocSavage

That seems tedious. I mean, since with the ignore feature one could simply hide all of your comments in one or two clicks, if they thought they were annoying, rather than following you around sabotaging your peace like a psychotic ex-wife.

Furthermore, what gives them the right to decide what I want to see? How is it OK to censor my content because it offends them? That’s like somebody hiding all the onions from me, simply because they don’t like them. How do they get to decide what I read and don’t read? If they don’t like it, just ignore them, right?

Several of us knew this flagging feature was stupid on day one of this forum. The abuse of the feature was childishly predictable.

What this dude said…

[Roopull]

Oh, and I think this thread is perfectly on topic… taserface & all.

Plus, too, and also, if you’re reading this & you’re the one flagging people, just know I think you’re kinda’ pathetic.
If you’re going to flag a post, please please please make it something really juicy you’re flagging. I get a little frustrated seeing a flagged post, thinking I’m going to get to see something off the wall nuts, but it’s just some dude with a normal rational opinion.

That’s false advertisement, my man. Totally bogus.

Flagging should be used EXCLUSIVELY to communicate to the rest of the forum that what you’re flagging is the most entertaining crap you’ve seen all day.

[Loki_Aesir]

that’s serious accusation, i hope you got screens of that

[Charlie9204_XO]

Hello all,
@65239400 , as I told you on the first topic GM privilege in battles, - #8, If you think a sanction is unjustified, you can appeal with that link Game rule violations & Appeals against a penalty - Rules - Crossout

Discussing it on a public topic isn’t the way to solve it.

Also, since you deliberately opened a second topic on the same subject after you have been explicitly told to not do it, you’ll have a sanction corresponding your action.

Rule violated : 3.2.21. Public discussion of the actions of the Administration. (for your information)

The reason of such rule is obvious : such discussion about staff actions can be simply presented without full context to other players, and spread false rumors about staff actions and do nothing constructive about the player’s issue but only damage the reputation of the GMs.

GMs like myself and anyone are humain and can make mistakes. If that’s what any player think about their sanctions, they can appeal via the link above.

Regards