Score the only goal in a match? 9pts. Don’t score or get a defence? 55pts!
You score and a team mate scores? you get 6pts, they get 52pts!
What the hell is this moronic scoring system?
There should be a base amount of points for a victory(including victory in E.T.), additional points per goal and per defence, additional points for a whitewash, and no points loss for drawing.
Crippling players nearing rewards that are just repeats from previous challeneges or can be bought on the market is a stupid decision to make.
There’s no answer to this because they’ll never divulge how the scoring system works, just like they’ll never explain why the crates I exchanged for badges always gave me the least valuable items from the selection that was available.
My guess is that it’s a standard ELO scoring so if you were by far the best ranked player of your team, you would gain basically nothing because victory is expected against lesser opponents, and on the other hand, the player in your team in copper won a lot because they were against better enemies. Those difference would show that the matchmaking is struggling to make teams with the same ELO… did you wait a lot ?
Edit : And my guess is that what people do in the game does not matter a lot. Mostly winning/losing. It probably matters a bit but way less than the ELO score.
No, generally didn’t wait long. Did play a number of games that were a whitewash, some started me in the center for kickoff and just shot immediatly and lobbed the opposition so didn’t come up against great opposition a number of times.
It’s still a moronic system if you can’t matchmake appropriatly. 6 points for a win in bronze when the gap to silver is 300 is ridiculous. Thats 50 consecutive wins. The game between those 2 I screenshoted was a defeat and lost 6pts. Thats why there needs to be a reasonable baseline so progression between leagues isn’t crippling due to one sided matchmaking. it’s not like the ultimate reward in this mode is a legendary weapon.
