also i want to point out that your valuable source of data is completely manipulable. i literally changed numbers in the combat log and the website couldnt care less. so continue drawing your data from there ig
1 Like
I didnāt make nothing up there buddy and that is not even a counter arguement it is just you talking out your xxx because you think your better at the game then you are and you canāt handle thinking that your anything less than average. Heres a skill you can use, man the xxxx up, eat some humble pie and get gud instead of bashing everything and everyone because you suck
before you say that define what āgood at the gameā means. since you dont take individual skill nor teamplay into account
anything better than a 60% win rate at least, anything less is mediocre and im sure your win rate is not higher than 60%.
winrate in what? missions, cc cw?
Theres players that donāt queue up and they can still come out with a 60% win rate they are the truley skilled players not you
anything, if you donāt have at least 60% in either cc, cw, pvp than your not truely skilled your just average like alot of players in the game myself included
winrate in competitive modes entirely depends on your team. unless youre playing meta garbage, which im obviously not, so i cant carry the entire team by holding W.
i can have perfect aim, movement and team coordination, but that will never get me a win if everyone else dies.
No it donāt, it increases the odds but there are players that are good enough to carry a team. Now having a team behind you will always increase your winrate no doubt but teamplay is a skill in and of itself. Now even solo players can still scrape by at least 45% minimum and good solo players will have at least a 7% weighting so even good solo players can scrape 57% or more win rates. Theres some players that can maybe still scrape 65% win percentages solo, maybe not in clan wars buy in cc and pvp they can
what do these players play? bricks, relics, or hitscan in the past?
well if we go off our reliable data source, i should be an exceptional player.
60% and 75% and even 100% winrate. its sad corvo got nerfed because it was actually easier to carry teams with it when it was hitscan.
why are you mentioning this if were talking about cw the whole time?
donāt look at anything unless there is at least 5 games and only then if it is an extreme like 17% lossses 50% i would discard but yea that 17% is most definitely an extreme and increases the odds you suck. those 2s discard that you got a a few more games to compare it too. You can easily flip heads twice but flipping heads 6 times in a row donāt happen all that much
you have a really low standard for which data is considered usable
Want me to do the math for yea?
6 sample size is more useable then you think if the values are in the extremes
yea do the math on a sample size of 12 games, uploaded by competitive players probably running relics in teams. this data is useless
sample size of 6 is nothing
no 2 is nothing 6 is a little something
6 is absolutely nothing
Only when the value is between 20-80% but your at 17% losses so it is valid indicator.
sample size of 6 is nothing, any data you take from it is useless. there is nothing valid about 6 games uploaded manually by sweats