Lol, yeah. That’s what I thought, I’m trying to be polite.
I always see people complain about 2-3k spreads.
I always think “hmmmm… 2-3k spreads would be nice.”
The platforms are different for sure.
Lol, yeah. That’s what I thought, I’m trying to be polite.
I always see people complain about 2-3k spreads.
I always think “hmmmm… 2-3k spreads would be nice.”
The platforms are different for sure.
Turrets work fine with 30 FPS, but thanks!
This potato was originally Windows 7, but I take donations.
I don’t think the human eye sees more than 30 FPS, so not sure I am worried about it, but thanks!
People keep saying this:
But my eyes can easily see the difference in 30-40-50 and 60 fps.
This may be normal but it definitely is not good.
And like many matches, the top scorers on both teams in your screenshot aren’t the high PS players.
I think people worry too much about PS spreads.
I used to think that way, but I am based in reality so did research.
Turrets are just like any other gun. If you play at 30 fps, your turrets have half the frames to hit someone than at 60 fps.
It isn’t about what your eye sees, its about how many frames you have to hit your target and responsiveness to controls.
Note: I can tell anything under 60 fps after getting used to 240+. It looks choppy and controls are way way less responsive.
Yeah, you probably are ready for a newer PC. too bad we don’t know each other irl. I have a spare 10100 paired with a 3060. (I have a 5900x paired with a 3080)
In my experience, the higher in PS you go, the lower skilled players you will encounter.
High PS gameplay is like world of tanks, players with giant slow cars shooting each other and doing little damage because everyone has so many hp.
Wow, thats dumb derpy_driver. Play some badasses at higher PS and find out
No he’s very much right, most players seem very slow… mainly copy paste builds and the only tactics they know are:
Cloak and run into enemy with melee… or hide miles away with ranged
Most people hide all game and hope the enemy engage them in a way in which is advantageous rather than trying to use their brain and make a play themselves… matches become a boring campfest
I try to follow whoever I regard as “the best player” on my team and shoot whatever they shoot. I don’t always succeed, I have a streak of YOLO.
Camping games suck imo.
This is soooooo not true.
It is, it’s why you struggle down at 9000ps
This mode is fine. The only real issue is the immediate rage-quitting other players keep doing.
If one team forms a coherent death-ball, then it gets a little lopsided, but that’s true for every Mission mode.
I remember on the old forums when players were asking for a Mission mode that wasn’t just sitting in a circle.
From previous experience, i regret to inform you that the response time of targem games to make a nerf or fix one of their mistakes like slaughter mode, is about 6 months to 6 years.
Or never
I play a lot of mandrakes, so whenever slaughter comes up it is literal hell on earth for me.
Yeah they clearly didnt think this game mode through, its hell for all long range players or ammo users.
At least most ammo users don’t have a minimum range
I shall continue to remove myself from this preposterous game mode at game start until the end of time.
And according to the players i see drop from this game mode it seems i am not alone.
Yeah this game mode is kinda like some of the creatures that prowl this forum, you don’t want to deal with it/them but are stuck doing so because of lack of hindsight from the Devs
Slaughter should be a separate mode and a block feature should be available